Spina Bifida

Spina Bifida


Spina bifida is defined as a congenital bony defect affecting the vertebral arches arising from incomplete caudal neurulation. There is typically a saccular protrusion of neural elements through the spinal defect which may or may not be skin covered. As a consequence of this there is herniation of the posterior fossa contents through the foramen magnum (Arnold-Chiari malformation). If the sac contains meninges and cerebrospinal fluid it is known as a meningocele. When elements of spinal cord and/or nerves are present, it is termed a meningomyelocele (or myelomeningocele). This is the most common lesion, accounting for more than 90% of cases. Myeloschisis occurs when the open neural tube is not covered and is open to the exterior. Craniorachischisis refers to exposure of both cranial and spinal neural elements. Spina bifida can occur at any location along the spine with lumbar and lumbosacral lesions being most common. As part of the Arnold-Chiari malformation, hydrocephalus develops in the majority of cases.


The most useful findings in suggesting the diagnosis of spina bifida are the features of spinal dysraphism (with disruption of the dorsal skin line by a protruding sac), and the presence of associated cranial defects. Spinal findings: Transverse views – the normal spinal cord appears as a closed circle with three prominences at each level representing two posterior (laminar) ossification centres and one anterior (vertebral body) ossification centre. In spina bifida the posterior laminae are absent and the lateral processes are splayed and displaced laterally, forming a characteristic V or U shape. Coronal views – normally, three parallel lines are seen, the lateral two representing the posterior ossification centres, the middle representing the anterior ossification centres. Separation or splaying of the two lateral lines implies the presence of spina bifida at that level. Sagittal views – in the normal spine two parallel lines representing the posterior and anterior ossification centres are seen converging towards the sacrum. Absence of the posterior aspect of these lines indicates a spinal defect. Exaggerated curvatures of the spine are often present in spina bifida and sagittal views will demonstrate any coexisting lordosis and/or kyphosis. Some points for consideration:- Even in experienced hands small closed defects can be missed, especially in the cervical or sacral regions. These lesions may be difficult to diagnose particularly if there is no protruding sac or if the fetus is in an awkward position. In the latter situation or at any time where there is diagnostic doubt the ultrasound examination must be repeated on another occasion. Experience is needed to avoid false positive diagnoses due to incomplete or absent ossification in the second trimester. Ossification of the laminae of the lower lumbar region is not usually seen before nineteen weeks gestation. The arch of the upper sacral region is not always seen until after twenty-five weeks. Transverse views are generally superior as all three ossification centres may be seen in the same plane. Coronal and sagittal views, however, will show many levels at the same time and abnormalities of structure, shape and mineralisation of the spine are better appreciated. A protruding sac will be best seen in a sagittal plane as will the integrity of the skin of the fetal back. Coronal views enable comparison of any suspected dysraphism with normal adjacent levels. Cranial findings:- The intracranial findings associated with spina bifida are generally related to the herniation of posterior fossa contents through the foramen magnum. Ventriculomegaly is characteristic, arising from obstruction of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid into the basal cisterns. The prevalence in fetuses with myelomeningocele increases with gestational age so that after twenty-four weeks gestation, 94% of affected fetuses will have a lateral atrial diameter greater than 10 mm. Ventriculomegaly worsens with increasing gestation in open spina bifida while the head circumference remains relatively small. There is a characteristic shape of the head related to the Arnold-Chiari malformation known as the lemon sign, where there is scalloping of the frontal bones within the parietal bones to compensate for the caudad shift in anterior cranial contents. This frontal bone deformity is best demonstrated on transverse views of the fetal head in the transthalamic plane, but may be absent after twenty four weeks gestation as the bones become less malleable. There is also a characteristic shape of the cerebellum in spina bifida known as the banana sign. Displacement of the pons and medulla through the foramen magnum compresses the cerebellum against the occipital bone. This process deforms the cerebellum and gives it the appearance of a banana in the transcerebellar plane. It also effaces the cisterna magna. Therefore obliteration of the cisterna magna or failure to see the cerebellum are excellent pointers to the presence of spina bifida, and if a normal cisterna magna is seen it is unlikely that an open spina bifida is present. Associated ultrasound findings may include other central nervous system malformations such as holoprosencephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and the Dandy-Walker malformation. Diastematomyelia, intraspinal lipoma and dermoid cysts may also be associated with myelomeningocele. Disorders of other systems are common, and include renal, thoracic, gastrointestinal and facial malformations. Aneuploidy has been reported in up to 10% of cases.

Differential Diagnosis

There are other spinal defects requiring differentiation: Myelocystocele, which is a localised dilatation of the spinal cord, may be difficult to distinguish from a closed simple meningocele with a small spinal defect. In this condition, however, there is no bony defect apparent. Lipomyelomeningocele is a rare lesion involving a fatty tumour of the spinal cord with associated spinal dysraphism which may be difficult to differentiate from meningomyelocele. The lesion is predominantly solid, however, in comparison with the cystic appearance of the defect in spina bifida. Diastematomyelia, which may coexist with spina bifida, will be apparent by the presence of the midline bony spur arising between the posterior ossification centres on coronal views. Sacrococcygeal teratomas not only have a solid and cystic appearance, but they may be associated with extensive local destruction, and are likely to become progressively larger.

Sonographic Features

Intracranial signs:

Anterior calvarial collapse.

Obliteration of cisterna magna by cerebellum.

Progressive ventriculomegaly.

Spinal signs:

Splaying of posterior ossification centres.

Kyphosis and scoliosis.

Protrusion of cystic sac, disrupting normal skin line.

Associated Syndromes

  • Anophthalmia-NTD
  • Carbamazepine
  • Cerebro-costo-mandibular
  • Chromosomal
  • Czeizel-Losonci
  • Focal dermal hypoplasia
  • Fullana: caudal deficiency-asplenia
  • Goldberg: hemangioma-sacral anomalies
  • Kousseff: sacral defects-conotruncal heart defects
  • Laterality sequence
  • Lehman: osteosclerosis-NTD
  • Maternal diabetes
  • Maternal hyperthermia
  • Melanocytosis-myelomeningocele
  • OEIS association
  • Renal-Mullerian agenesis
  • Scalp defect-craniostenosis
  • Thoracoabdominal eventration
  • Valproate
  • Waardenberg Type I
  • X-linked midline defects
  • X-linked neural tube defects


Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Filly RA Prenatally detected fetal myelomeningocele: is karyotype analysis warranted? Radiology 194: 491-494
Paidas MJ, Cohen A Disorders of the central nervous system Semin Perinatol 18: 266-282
Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Barth RA, Damato NM, Callen PW, Filly RA Prevalence of ventriculomegaly in association with myelomeningocele: correlation with gestational age and severity of posterior fossa deformity Radiology 190: 703-7
De Courcy-Wheeler RHB, Pomeranz MM, Wald NJ, Nicolaides KH Small fetal transverse cerebellar diameter: a screening test for spina bifida Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 904-905
Ball RH, Filly RA, Goldstein RB, Callen PW The lemon sign: not a specific indicator of meningomyelocele J Ultrasound Med 12: 131-134
Kollias SS, Goldstein RB, Cogen PH, Filly RA Prenatally detected myelomeningoceles: sonographic accuracy in estimation of the spinal level Radiology 185: 109-112
Hobbins JC Diagnosis and management of neural-tube defects today N Engl J Med 324: 690-691
Thiagarajah S, Henke J, Hogge WA, Abbitt PL, Breeden N, Ferguson JE Early diagnosis of spina bifida: the value of cranial utlrasound markers Obstet Gynecol 76: 54-57
Van den Hof MC, Nicolaides KH, Campbell J, Campbell S Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida Am J Obstet Gynecol 162: 322-327
Benacerraf BR, Stryker J, Frigoletto FD Abnormal US appearance of the cerebellum (banana sign): indirect sign of spina bifida Radiology 171: 151-153
Goldstein RB, Podrasky AE, Filly RA, Callen PW Effacement of the fetal cisterna magna in association with myelomeningocele Radiology 172: 409-413
Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, Mahony BS Abnormalities of fetal cranial contour in sonographic detection of spina bifida: evaluation of the lemon” sign “Radiology 167: 387-392
Furness ME, Barbary JE, Verco PW Fetal head shape in spina bifida in the second trimester J Clin Ultrasound 15: 451-453
Campbell J, Gilbert WM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs in a high-risk population Obstet Gynecol 70: 247-250
Nicolaides KH, Gabbe SG, Campbell S, Guidetti R Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs Lancet ii: 72-74
Grundy H, Glasmann A, Burlbaw J, Walton S, Dannar C, Doan L Hemangioma presenting as a cystic mass in the fetal neck J Ultrasound Med 4; 147-150
Dennis MA, Drose JA, Pretorius DH, Manco-Johnson ML Normal fetal sacrum simulating spina bifida: ópseudodysraphismò Radiology 155: 751-754
Allen LC, Doran TA, Miskin M, Rudd NL, Benzie RJ, Sheffield LJ Ultrasound and amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein in the prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida Obstet Gynecol 60: 169-173
Harmon JP, Hiett AK, Palmer CG, Golichowski AM Prenatal ultrasound detection of isolated neural tube defects: is cytogenetic evaluation warranted? Obstet Gynecol 84: 595-599